“B” Occupancy Common Path of Travel

General Definition

  • IBC (International Building Code – USA)
    • As per the IBC 2018, Section 1006.2.1, the Common Path of Travel is the distance an occupant must travel before they reach a point where they have access to at least two independent exits.
  • BSL (Building Standards Law – Japan)
  • Japan’s Building Standards Law (BSL, 建築基準法, Article 119) defines Common Path of Travel as the distance occupants must travel before reaching a point where two or more independent exit options are available.

Common path of travel refers to the portion of an exit access route where occupants must travel before reaching a point where they have a choice of two or more independent exits or exit access doorways. This is a critical factor in fire safety design because it determines how far people can travel before being at risk of being trapped by fire or smoke.


IBC (USA) – Common Path of Travel Requirements

Under the International Building Code (IBC 2018), the maximum allowable common path of travel depends on whether the building is sprinklered or non-sprinklered.

Key Requirements

  • Maximum Common Path of Travel in Sprinklered Buildings:
    • 100 feet (30.48 meters)
    • Applies to buildings protected by an automatic fire sprinkler system.
    • The increased allowance is because sprinklers help control fire growth, reducing the immediate danger to occupants.
  • Maximum Common Path of Travel in Non-Sprinklered Buildings:
    • 75 feet (22.86 meters)
    • Applies to buildings without automatic sprinklers, requiring shorter distances to minimize the risk of occupants being trapped.
  • Occupancy-Based Adjustments:
    • Certain occupancies, such as Group H (high-hazard), Group R (residential), and Group I (institutional/hospitals), may have stricter limits to ensure quick evacuation.
    • Industrial & storage buildings may allow longer common paths under specific conditions.
  • Fire Protection Features That Affect Common Path Limits:
    • Fire-rated corridors and automatic smoke control systems may allow for modifications to the common path limits.
    • Egress lighting and clear exit signage are required to guide occupants safely along the common path.

BSL (Japan) – Common Path of Travel Requirements

Japan’s Building Standards Law (BSL, 建築基準法, Article 119) regulates maximum common path of travel distances based on fire safety measures and building type.

Key Requirements

  • Maximum Common Path of Travel in Sprinklered Buildings:
    • 30 meters (98.4 feet)
    • Similar to IBC’s 100-foot requirement but slightly shorter to emphasize faster access to multiple exits.
  • Maximum Common Path of Travel in Non-Sprinklered Buildings:
    • 20 meters (65.6 feet)
    • This is stricter than IBC’s 75-foot limit, ensuring shorter travel distances to exits in non-sprinklered buildings.
  • Stricter Limits for High-Rise and Public Buildings:
    • For buildings taller than 31 meters (10+ stories), additional exit pathways must be designed to keep common paths as short as possible.
    • Hospitals, elderly care facilities, and underground buildings require even shorter common paths due to occupant mobility concerns.
  • Compartmentalization & Fireproof Design Considerations:
    • Fire-rated partitions and egress vestibules help limit the risk of long common paths.
    • Barrier-free egress routes must be designed to allow all occupants, including individuals with disabilities, to reach an independent exit safely.

Comparison Table: Maximum Common Path of Travel

FeatureIBC (USA) – RequiredBSL (Japan) – Required
Maximum Common Path (Sprinklered Buildings)100 feet (30.48 m)30 meters (98.4 feet)
Maximum Common Path (Non-Sprinklered Buildings)75 feet (22.86 m)20 meters (65.6 feet)
Stricter Limits for High-Rise Buildings?Only in specific occupanciesYes, especially in buildings over 31m
Hospitals & Care FacilitiesSpecial egress requirements applyMore restrictive common path distances
Underground Buildings & TunnelsSpecial egress planning requiredStricter limits due to smoke accumulation risks
Barrier-Free ComplianceADA & ICC A117.1Universal design encouraged

Case Study

Common Path of Travel Compliance in a Mixed-Use Office Building – Honolulu vs. Tokyo

  • Project Overview
    • A 5-story mixed-use office building is planned for construction in:
      • Honolulu, USA (IBC jurisdiction)
      • Toyosu, Japan (BSL jurisdiction)
  • The building includes:
    • Office spaces on floors 2-5
    • Retail spaces on the ground floor
    • Two enclosed stairwells and one open-air emergency exit route

Honolulu (IBC) Compliance

  • Challenge:
    • The original design had a common path of 95 feet (28.9 m) in the office spaces.
    • The building is sprinklered, so the 100-foot limit applies, but the longest corridors were approaching this maximum distance.
  • Solution:
    • Added a secondary exit door at the midpoint of office corridors to break up the common path distance.
    • Installed clear exit signage and emergency lighting to improve wayfinding.
    • Ensured all exit doors had proper fire-rated hardware per IBC requirements.

Tokyo (BSL) Compliance

  • Challenge:
    • The Tokyo office had a common path of 28 meters (91.8 feet), which exceeded BSL’s 30-meter sprinklered limit but met IBC requirements.
  • Solution:
    • Reconfigured egress corridors to reduce the longest common path to 25 meters (82 feet), staying within BSL limits.
    • Implemented fireproof compartmentalization in long corridors to minimize fire spread.
    • Ensured all exit routes complied with Japan’s barrier-free accessibility requirements for universal egress.

Final Universal Design Approach for Both Locations

  • To ensure compliance with both IBC (Honolulu) and BSL (Tokyo), the project adopted a universal design strategy:
    • Kept maximum common paths under 90 feet (27.4 m) to ensure compliance in both jurisdictions.
    • Reconfigured exit corridors to optimize egress paths and minimize dead ends.
    • Used fire-rated partitions and egress lighting to enhance safety.
    • Ensured at least two fully enclosed stairwells for safe evacuation in both locations.

Key Takeaways

  • IBC allows for longer common paths (100 feet for sprinklered buildings) compared to BSL (30 meters / 98.4 feet).
  • BSL enforces a much shorter common path distance for non-sprinklered buildings (20 meters / 65.6 feet) compared to IBC’s 75 feet (22.86 meters).
  • High-rise and underground buildings in Japan require stricter limits due to compartmentalized fire safety.
  • A universal design approach limiting common paths to 90 feet (27.4 meters) ensures compliance in both jurisdictions while enhancing safety.




Global Approach for Common Path of Travel – Group B Occupancy

To ensure international compliance and optimized safety, the following globally unified guidelines for maximum common path of travel in Group B occupancy are proposed based on integration of the IBC (USA) and BSL (Japan) standards:

  • Maximum Common Path of Travel

Sprinklered Buildings:

  • Recommended Global Maximum: 30 meters (approximately 100 feet).
  • This ensures compliance with both IBC (100 ft.) and BSL (30 m), promoting universal acceptance in international contexts.

Non-Sprinklered Buildings:

  • Recommended Global Maximum: 20 meters (approximately 65 feet).
  • Adopting the more stringent limit from BSL enhances safety standards internationally, especially in buildings without sprinkler systems.
  • Special Building Considerations
    • Commercial Buildings (over 75 feet (23 meters) 🙂
      • Adopt more restrictive common path distances due to evacuation complexity, aligning closely with BSL guidelines. Additional protective measures such as pressurized stairwells and compartmentalization should be integrated.
    • Hospitals & Care Facilities:
      • Utilize more restrictive common path travel limits in alignment with both IBC and BSL, due to the sensitive nature and evacuation complexities.
    • Underground Buildings & Tunnels:
      • Specialized and stringent common path limits are recommended, emphasizing shorter distances and enhanced protective measures to ensure safety in underground conditions.
  • Barrier-Free and Universal Design Compliance
    • Ensure common path dimensions and design adhere strictly to ADA/ICC A117.1 (USA) and Japanese barrier-free standards. Emphasis should be placed on clear, intuitive navigation, and universal accessibility considerations.

By implementing these integrated standards, Group B occupancy buildings can enhance occupant safety, accessibility, and international regulatory compliance.

Common Path of Travel (T.P.)
(Sprinklered Buildings) USA: 100 feet (30.48 m) * Japan: 30 meters (98.4 feet)
(Non-Sprinklered Buildings) USA 75 feet (22.86 m) * Japan: 20 meters (65.6 feet)
StoryOccupancy TypeMax Occupant Load Per StoryMax Common Path of Egress Travel Distance (ft)
First story above or below grade planeA, B, E, F, M, U4975
H-2, H-3325
H-4, H-5, I, R-1, R-2, S1075
S2975
Second story above grade planeB, F, M, S2975
Third story and aboveNP (Not Permitted)N/AN/A
  • For SI: 1 foot = 304.8 mm.
  • NP = Not Permitted.
  • NA = Not Applicable.
  • (a.) Buildings classified as Group R-2 equipped throughout with an automatic sprinkler system in accordance with Section 903.3.1.1 or 903.3.1.2 and provided with emergency escape and rescue openings in accordance with Section 1030.
  • (b.) Group B, F and S occupancies in buildings equipped throughout with an automatic sprinkler system in accordance with Section 903.3.1.1 shall have a maximum exit access travel distance of 100 feet.
  • (c.) This table is used for R-2 occupancies consisting of sleeping units. For R-2 occupancies consisting of dwelling units, use Table 1006.3.3(1).
  • (d.) The length of exit access travel distance in a Group S-2 open parking garage shall be not more than 100 feet