General Definition

• The IBC (International Building Code, Section 1005) establishes exit width requirements to ensure safe and efficient evacuation during emergencies. The required width is based on occupant load, occupancy type, and whether the building has a sprinkler system.
  • The Building Standard Law of Japan (BSL) also regulates exit width requirements but provides more flexibility based on building type, fire protection measures, and occupancy size.

• Comprehensive Comparison Table: IBC Sections 1005.3.1 & 1005.3.2 vs. BSL Article 119

Aspect	IBC (Sections 1005.3.1 & 1005.3.2 – USA)	BSL (Article 119 – Japan)	Key Differences & Considerations
Stairways – Exit Width per Occupant Load	– 0.3 inches (7.62 mm) per occupant. – Minimum 44 inches (1118 mm) for occupant load >50. – Minimum 36 inches (914 mm) for occupant load ≤50.	– Minimum 120 cm (47.2 inches) for large assembly occupancy. – Adjustments based on high-density buildings.	– IBC width varies based on occupant load, while BSL sets a fixed minimum. – BSL requires wider stairs (120 cm) by default, while IBC only scales up based on load.
Other Egress Components (Doors, Corridors, Ramps, etc.)	– 0.2 inches (5.08 mm) per occupant. – Minimum corridor width: 44 inches (1118 mm). – Minimum door width: 32 inches (813 mm) clear opening.	– Minimum corridor width: 90 cm (35.4 inches). – Minimum door width: 80 cm (31.5 inches). – 120 cm (47.2 inches) minimum for large assembly corridors.	– IBC corridor width is slightly wider than BSL’s 90 cm minimum. – IBC doors are wider than BSL’s 80 cm minimum (32 inches vs. 31.5 inches).
Required Exit Width for 1,000 Occupants (Example Calculation)	– Stairs: 0.3 inches × 1,000 occupants = 300 inches (7.62 m). – Corridors: 0.2 inches × 1,000 occupants = 200 inches (5.08 m). – Requires multiple stairways and corridors.	– Minimum stair width: 120 cm (47.2 inches). – Minimum corridor width: 120 cm (47.2 inches) for large assemblies. – Minimum door width: 80 cm (31.5 inches) per door.	– IBC results in much wider exit pathways in large occupancies, while BSL maintains a fixed standard. – BSL is simpler, but IBC is more scalable for larger crowds.
Special Considerations for Exit Width Adjustments	– Increases required if fire protection features are absent or high-density usage is expected. – Width reductions allowed in sprinklered buildings.	– Adjustments based on risk assessment and fire safety studies. – Building layout influences width adjustments.	– IBC dynamically adjusts exit width based on fire safety levels and occupancy. – BSL uses fire risk assessments rather than strict formulas.
Stair Width Standardization (Recommendation)	Increase minimum stair width to 120 cm (47.2 inches) for consistency.	Introduce occupant-based stair width increases for large assemblies.	– Aligning IBC’s minimum stair width with BSL’s 120 cm standard would enhance safety.
Exit Width Simplicity (Recommendation)	Provide fixed-width alternatives for smaller occupancies to simplify compliance.	Consider occupant-based width scaling for adaptability.	– IBC is more complex but adaptable, BSL is simpler but less scalable.
Door Width Improvements (Recommendation)	Increase minimum door width from 32 inches to 35 inches (900 mm) for accessibility.	Increase minimum door width to 85 cm (33.5 inches) to meet global accessibility standards.	– BSL’s door width is slightly below international accessibility recommendations. – IBC could benefit from a wider minimum door width for better accessibility.

---

Key Takeaways

1. IBC uses occupant-based width calculations, while BSL enforces fixed minimum widths.
2. BSL requires a minimum stair width of 120 cm (47.2 inches), which is wider than IBC’s 44-inch (1118 mm) minimum.
3. IBC allows width reductions for sprinklered buildings, while BSL uses flexible width adjustments based on fire safety assessments.
4. BSL corridor and door widths are slightly smaller than IBC requirements, which may affect accessibility.
5. IBC’s method is more precise for large occupancies, while BSL’s approach is simpler and easier to apply.
6. Both codes could benefit from harmonization by adopting aspects of each other’s standards (e.g., IBC could adopt fixed-width options, and BSL could incorporate occupant-based scaling).

Recommendations for Improvement

• For IBC (USA):
  • Increase minimum stair width to 120 cm (47.2 inches) for better evacuation flow.
  • Increase corridor width to 48 inches (1220 mm) for large assemblies to reduce congestion.
  • Increase door width to 35 inches (900 mm) for improved accessibility.
  • Limit egress width reductions in sprinklered buildings to prevent excessive downsizing.
  • Introduce fixed minimum widths for small to medium-sized occupancies to simplify compliance.

• For BSL (Japan):
  • Introduce occupant-based exit width scaling for large assemblies (>1,000 occupants).
  • Increase corridor width to 100 cm (39.4 inches) for large assembly halls.
  • Increase door width to 85 cm (33.5 inches) to enhance accessibility.
  • Allow longer common paths (up to 35m/115ft) in open-plan assembly halls.
  • Establish clear width-increase requirements based on occupant density per floor area.

General Recommendations for Both Codes

• Harmonize global standards (e.g., 120 cm stair, 85-90 cm door) for international compliance.
• Use performance-based egress design with flexible exit width solutions.
• Implement smart evacuation systems with AI-based crowd control.
• Strengthen universal design for better accessibility and inclusivity.